Women Writers and Their Persuasive Pens: Female Literary Discourse against Slavery 1788-1834


The ‘Am I not a Man and a Brother’ slogan used by the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/abolition/abolition_tools_gallery_06.shtml

Literature is such a fascinating force within history. It has a dual relationship with it that both shapes and is shaped by the context in which it is produced. Within the world of eighteenth and nineteenth century Britain, opportunities for shaping society through literature abounded. The best example of this binary relationship can be seen in the writing against slavery in the period as perspectives on the spectrum of opinion regarding abolition were inculcated within poetry and novels.

The purpose of this literary production was intentional and unapologetic in its persuasive aims. It sought to change hearts and minds, to shift public opinion and to bring about change. This action was performed by both men and women, however it was Hannah More, not James Stephen, who was asked by the abolitionists to construct a poem about Wilberforce’s bill to abolish the slave trade. The “feminine” emotional touch was recognized as a powerful force for the abolitionist cause.

Too often in feminist accounts of history the role of women is accounted for as supplementary, and as marginalised so as to emphasise the oppressed nature of women’s experience throughout history. The female literature against slavery that was produced between 1788 and 1834 offers a narrative of female agency that cannot be relegated to the marginal but struck at the heart of the abolitionist cause in Britain. The power of literature was realized, harnessed and played upon by the women writers of the eighteenth century in order to affect change, and that change was the abolition of the slave trade.

Hannah More, Anna Laetitia Barbauld, Maria Edgeworth, Jane Austen and Elizabeth Heyrick were each women who contributed to the discourse against slavery during the period. They played with characterisation, imagery, morality, and the ever-popular (except if there is a French Revolution occurring) rhetoric of human rights. Each of these sought to mobilise sentiment against slavery, whether that be simply ameliorative action or outright abolition.

These women sought to invoke the public perception of “the slave” and further characterise this archetype within their own writing. The power and importance of deep characterisation lay in the empathetic value of presenting a new perspective. Lynn Hunt in her book Inventing Human Rights identifies the novel as a key turning point in the development of human rights in the eighteenth century. It allowed literate individuals to step outside of their class confines and experience a world that would have otherwise remained entirely foreign to them.

People who could read also happened to be the powerbrokers of Britain and this new experience, albeit a literary one, equipped them with the knowledge that even little, lesser and oppressed people were in fact human, with thoughts, feelings and ideas of their own. People who, in short, experienced the same suffering and joys they themselves felt only in different circumstances. The power of this realization, and employing the realization in literature with intentionality was extraordinary.

More, Edgeworth and Austen were masters of presenting the perspective of others within their texts. More engaged specifically with the already established archetype of the slave which had existed within the literary British public from the time of Aphra Behn’s Oronoko (1788). Edgeworth then presented an ameliorative solution to slavery by the in depth characterization of a benevolent slave owner coupled with faithful, happy slaves.

The imagery employed by each of the writers was extremely effective and powerful. Barbauld consciously refers to the power of literature in the abolitionist discourse claiming “The Preacher, Poet, Senator in vain” had rattled in British society’s “sight the Negro’s chain.” It was rattled, exposed, discussed and this was not only physically done by abolitionists to garner support for their cause but the effect was transferred literarily through painting an image of suffering that was both realistic and acute.

Invoking the readers sense of Christian morality was also heavily played upon specifically by abolitionist writers, while the ameliorative discourse offered a more secular understanding of morals surrounding slavery. The abolitionist movement was often characterised by evangelical Christians heading the charge against the injustice of slavery.

Heyrick offers a particularly practical and rational method of securing abolition to her readers. She played on emotion, morality, imagery and human rights rhetoric, but her most powerful tool was the assignation of responsibility and the way she empowered her readers to be effective change makers through abstinence.

The way these women asserted influence in a period of inherent patriarchy that eighteenth and nineteenth centuries in Britain were is truly remarkable. Although the legacy of abolition is more problematic than the romanticized narrative, and British patriots would have us believe, their achievement and the women writers key role within it was an amazing feat. 

Further Reading:

Ferguson, Moira., Subject to Others: British Women Writers and Colonial Slavery, 1670-1834, Routledge (New York: 1992)

Boulukos, George E., The Grateful Slave, Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge: 2008)

Hunt, Lynn., Inventing Human Rights: A History, W.W. Norton and Company, (New York: 2007)

Midgley, Clare., Women Against Slavery: The British Campaigns 1780-1870, Routledge (London: 1992)

5 comments on “Women Writers and Their Persuasive Pens: Female Literary Discourse against Slavery 1788-1834

  1. danielqatmq says:

    What a fascinating piece! Your passion for the subject absolutely shone through in this post. It made for a very charming read 🙂

    While familiar with some of the authors works, I never really considered the connotations they had towards slavery not their historical importance.

    The parallel you draw between them and the history below movement shows that you really thought through the historical issues. This would be important, as I’d imagine a topic like this could easily slip into becoming an English essay rather than a History essay.

    The fact that these writers were so ahead of the curve is important and I think your work really highlights this 🙂 well done!

  2. dloneragan says:

    This is a wonderful and thoroughly interesting topic of study. What I found especially admirable is the way in which you emphasise and highlight aspects of historical agency that are probably often overlooked. The role of educated women in the creation and dissemination of literary culture in a period of patriarchal repression is truly fascinating. Moreover, your ideas help prompt further reflections on the general role of high culture itself in social emancipation as well as its role in the boundary-transcending communication of human suffering. This aspect of cultural and artistic practice is something that I think is too quickly forgotten, and I really like the fact that you stress its importance in your work. Too often the arts are treated as mere entertainment, when, in fact, literature can utterly transform our perception in the world and thus mobilise political and ethical consciousness. I think you communicated your thought-provoking insights very nicely. Well done!

  3. tomloomesmq says:


    I really enjoyed this blog post because it follows a relationship in history that is often disregarded: the connection between literature and popular culture and politics. While I agree with the comment above that this could easily slip into the arena of English rather than History, I think you capture the historical aspects of this topic really well. You constantly reflect back on how this literature is perceived in common, popular history, outside of the literary paradigm. Tracing the historical abolition of slavery in tandem with literary greats, especially female literary greats is something I would not have conceived but it’s truly something interesting to read.


    P.S. I really like how you recognise the importance of seeing these female writers as not part of the marginalised few, but as part of the outspoken collection of female writers who rose above the oppression narrative of feminism.

  4. giamtesta says:

    Dear Nicole, this is an exceptionally well written blog. It was interesting to note how your research attempted to bring alive the abolitionist cause in a period of great political change. From 1788 to 1834, the push against slavery in Britain ran alongside a series of important events, such as the French Revolution (1789), the Slave Trade Act (1807), the Great Reform Act (1832). The cause perhaps reached its greatest success with the passing of the Slavery Abolition Act (1833). Parliamentary decisions are ultimate evidence of reform, however there is a often hidden driver of change which is literature and this blog attempts to highlight this aspect. Even more interesting, when literature is being composed by women who take up the abolitionist cause to advance their own social and political conditions, to be active and proficient agents of progress. As to the literary effects upon the common population there are always some doubts. However, the motor of change at the time would have been the rising middle class (intermediate between nobility and peasantry) to which women like Hannah More, Anna Laetitia Barbauld, Maria Edgeworth, Jane Austen and Elizabeth Heyrick belonged. An important part of that same group of people who called for a move forward from the Ancien Regime towards new avenues of progress. A pleasure to have been inspired by your work!

  5. mjwcowie says:

    What I find most interesting about your blog post is your assessment regarding the importance of essentially one subordinate social group, women, contributing to the contemporary discourse about another subjugated group in an attempt to effect change. Despite the lowly position of within the British public sphere generally, I find it quite intriguing that many writers of this period were able to utilise the reason why they were conceived of as belonging in the private sphere, their supposed feminine, emotional touch, to contribute to this argument. An engaging article, which I believe opens up readers to an area of history than would usually be overlooked. Well done in ensuring people are aware of the important role female writers had in the abolitionist movement in Britain.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s