Who was Jack Tar? The Many Faces of Nelson’s Navy





When you ask someone to visualise what they think life sailors during the Age of Sail were like, chances are that the images that they conjure up would be like a scene from Treasure Island, with swashbuckling pirates, scurvy ridden sailors drunk on rum, ridiculous ‘pirate accents’ where arrgghhh is every second word and the occasional flogging using the infamous cat o’ nine tails. Their way of life imply that they were free from the shackles of society, being able to live freely on the open seas. Though this may have some element of truth for pirate crews, their relatively relaxed organisation is in contrast with the disciplined European navies (though there were many overlapping experiences). The European navies of the late 18th and early 19th centuries were formidable machines that projected the influence of their state around the world and as such their organisation were highly regulated to ensure their efficiency. Consequently, the social hierarchy often reflected the society of their parent state and this was especially true of Britain’s Royal Navy.

The Royal Navy during the time of Admiral Horatio Nelson (1793-1815) was one of the most formidable fighting forces in the world. Though the ships of the Royal Navy were formidable weapons platforms within themselves, it was the officers and sailors who made it such a powerful force. These men, nicknamed Jack Tars, came from a variety of backgrounds from across the society of Britain and this diversity is translated into the distinct differences in experiences of that the men which is a reflection of how society worked at the time.

So how was British society like during this time? The period that Admiral Nelson lived in is known as the Georgian period (named after Kings George I-IV) and it was a period of Enlightenment, Innovation and Revolution. Such radical phenomena meant that radical change shortly followed. Some examples of these changes include improvements in food production, medicine and sanitation. Consequently, this led to a dramatic rise in the population which rose from nine million in 1750 to over eleven million by the early 19th century. Innovations in industry and agriculture, combined with increased literacy and education meant that the middle class now had a greater influence in society with some even attaining enough wealth to rival that of the landed gentry. Unlike some other European states, though British society was rather class conscious, movement between classes were rather flexible. This meant that, with enough wealth and social connections, the lower classes could potentially climb to the upper echelon of society. However, despite this opportunity to climb the social ladder, the lower classes were often stuck in their poverty due to being unable to earn enough money nor make the right contacts.


As previously mentioned, the way that the Royal Navy was administered was a reflection of how British society at the time functioned. The officers came from the upper and middle classes and competed each other to climb up the ranks, and gain wealth and prestige while the sailors came from the lower classes of society and for the most part could not hope to make into the upper echelons. That being said, due to the nature of naval life, there were also various differences from civilian society.

As previously mentioned, the officers drew mainly from the upper and middle classes of society. As is still the case, even members from the Royal family joined the Royal Navy, with the future King William IV serving as a midshipman from 1780-85. Many younger sons of the aristocratic families, due to them not inheriting their father’s estates and titles, also found naval services appealing as it offered them a chance to gain fame and wealth. Unlike many other European navies, the officer corps was not exclusively the domain of the aristocrats and in fact the professional middle class (doctors, lawyers, ect) made up around 50% of the officer corps. This reflected British society’s relatively flexible freedom of movement between the social classes.

In contrast, the sailors were often from the same background of the ‘scum of the earth’ that filled Lord Wellington’s army. Other sources of sailors were orphans from Charitable Societies, non sailors who had lost their jobs and merchant sailors who were pressed into naval service. Just as in the civilian world, despite the relative freedom of movement between social classes, the sailors were rarely ever able to enter into the upper ranks. Also like in the civilian world, they were subordinated to the the upper and middle class authorities.

However, despite this inequality, the conditions of naval life often meant that the officers and sailors developed a respect for each other. Both share the hardships and hazards of shipboard life and as such it was necessary for them to be able to work together without much animosity in order to ensure efficiency. Additionally, the Royal Navy was moving towards becoming a meritocracy and as such many of the officers were promoted based upon their ability to lead and not just their wealth and social connections. Therefore, though for the organisation of the navy for the most part reflected contemporary British society, the conditions of service meant that the class divide was less wide compared to civilian society. Consequently, this efficiency meant that Britain was able to ‘rule the waves’ and create the empire ‘where the sun never sets’.



Adkins, Roy, and Lesley Adkins. Jack Tar: The Extraordinary Lives of Ordinary Seamen in Nelson’s Navy. London: Abacus, 2009.
Ford, Franklin L. Europe: 1780-1830. London: Longman, 1989.
Lavery, Brian. Nelson’s Navy: The Ships, Men and Organisation 1793-1815. London: Conway Maritime Press, 2012.
Lincoln, Magarette. Representing the Royal Navy: British Sea Power, 1750-1815. Hants: Ashgate, 2002.
Marcus, G. J. Heart of Oak: A Survey of British Sea Power in the Georgian Era. London: Oxford University Press, 1975.
Pope, Dudley. Life in Nelson’s Navy. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1981.
Richardson, Patrick. Nelson’s Navy. London: Longman, 1967.
Williams, E. N. Life in Georgian England. London: B. T. Batsford Ltd, 1967.

4 comments on “Who was Jack Tar? The Many Faces of Nelson’s Navy

  1. A very well researched blog Tran. It helps me understand a bit more what life was like in the royal navy. Most of what I know about the royal navy during the Napoleonic Wars comes from the battle of Trafalgar and the Hornblower book/movie series. As we live in Australia we don’t learn about the Royal Navy in schools and have to research about this with our devices. It is interesting knowing that the lives of British sailors was not easy and how this period in history was a time of change for the navy. The navy looks like a somewhat solution to many problems faced by many poor men living in Britain. It would have been easy for these men to re enter civilian life after the war was over. This also shows how Britain came to have the best navy in the world as many officers were promoted on their skills rather then just their class as was the case in the army.

    • tranto94 says:

      Hey Michael, thanks for your comment! Yes, in general the navy was a bit more of a meritocracy than the army as to be promoted from a midshipman to a lieutenant, the aspiring officers had to pass an examination in front of a board of officers, where they were often asked questions such as “You are sent to a ship ordered to be fitted out, the captain not having appeared; the lower masts and bowsprits are in, but not rigged; what part of the rigging goes first over the mast heads?”. These were often expected to be answered in real time so if the midshipman hesitated for two long, the officers were at liberty to update the scenario and if they midshipman couldn’t keep up they were failed. This is in contrast with the army where commissions were mainly bought. That being said, social connections in the navy were still very important at this point in history and with enough wealth and connections, some men could rely on nepotism to bypass the system.

  2. jcandidomq says:

    Hi Tran. I always assumed that the Royal Navy was a very rigid institution, but my views have now changed. It is almost as if going out to sea gave the freedom to overcome class barriers to some extent, and the ability to leave behind the ingrained social hierarchy of British society. The move towards meritocracy does greatly help explain why the Royal Navy was so successful during the period i.e. rather than being commanded by incompetent aristocrats, middle class men could prove themselves and rise through the ranks. I believe that Nelson himself was an example of this, being born into an upper middle class family and dying as a decorated and title nobleman. Finally, I have had the ‘pleasure’ to go on a number of modern replicas of 18th and 19th century ships, and the confined conditions make me realise just how important maintaining efficiency and harmony on board would have been!

  3. tranto94 says:

    Hey Jordan, thanks for your comment! Indeed, Lord Nelson himself began life as the son of the rector of the church in a small village called Burnham Thorpe, though he did have some relatives in the Royal Navy on his mother’s side. If it wasn’t for his naval connections, Admiral Lord Nelson may have instead settled down to a rather mundane existence, becoming a church rector like his father, and be known as Reverend Horatio Nelson instead! Who knows how much different history would have been in that case. Though it was necessary that the officers maintain an air of authority and respect, some took the disciplining of the ship’s company too far and this led to instances of mutiny as the unpopular captain was overthrown, such as with the case of Captain William Bligh (who incidentally went on to become the Governor of NSW and was so unpopular that he provoked ANOTHER uprising against him during what became known as the ‘Rum Rebellion’).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s